headermask image

header image

Is Obama Selling Us Out or Simply Selling Himself to the Media?


I created the graph myself with data from a Pew Research Center study, taken from here.

Image via Wikipedia

Over at OpEd News in an article titled What’s the Matter in Madison?, the author makes the comparison of the Christian Right being to the Republicans what Progressives are to the Democrats:

…essential to an election victory, easily rallied and a dependable source of funds, but not to be considered seriously in any policy decisions. As Evangelicals are mocked by Wall Street, so Progressives are mocked as a fringe element by the likes of Pelosi and Reid. Progressives are the one group the Democrats think they’ll never have to pander to, as we’ll always be first to fall in line while asking for nothing in return. We lose issue after issue– FISA, war funding, single-payer health care and dozens of others, yet we’ll be the first to tell each other, “Forget FISA, think of the Supreme Court. Forget single-payer health care, think of the Supreme Court.” Then, when another corporate shill is appointed to the Court by a Democratic president, we’ll look ahead to the next election with our silly sad vows of Never Again, Never Again.

Now that Obama has the nomination wrapped up, the conventional wisdom is that he must swerve to the center in order to win against McCain.  And we are seeing lots of examples of that in fact happening.

There is something very distorted about this strategy but it is a reality that must be dealt with nevertheless.

Practically every poll out there indicates that the voters of America are overwhelmingly not in “the center” but in fact are “Progressives” even though many of them do not identify with the label.  We want single payer health care, withdrawal of our troops from Iraq, diplomacy rather than saber rattling towards Iran, stricter gun control, better environmental regulation, higher taxes for the upper income group, etc.  The list goes on and on.  It is only the extreme media bias caused by a highly concentrated media oligarchy that tricks some of us into believing that progressives values are somehow not in line with what the majority of us desire.

So if the majority of us are not centrist but hold progressive values and most of the rest hold regressive values such as being pro-war, anti-gay, pro-torture, pro-wiretapping, etc., who exactly is in the “center”?  In my opinion, there is almost no one there.

So why would Obama diss his progressive roots when he stands to gain little or nothing by doing so?

The reason Obama must move to the regressive side of the continuum is actually because he must convince those already holding power and their media puppets to support him.  Otherwise you will see the media conglomerates go after him and crush him in the general election.  They can and they will.  If you don’t think this is true, look at what happened to Kerry, Dukakis, Dean, etc.  These people were defeated more because of how the media treated them than because of a lack of support among the electorate.  The media trashes them and the electorate gives up on them as a result.

The tail is wagging the dog in this country because the dirty little secret is big media gets people elected (especially) at the national level, not voters.

So my point here is to understand that no matter how much Obama wants to support progressive values, he cannot do so and expect to win the Presidency.  And because this is true, we have two choices.  We can forego voting for him and see if the disaster of a McCain Presidency will be enough for us to make big changes to the course we are on or we can vote for him and hope that he follows in Bush’s footsteps and becomes a President that is totally unlike the positions he must take in order to get elected.  Worst case scenario if we elect Obama is we get a younger, more intelligent McCain in disguise.

None of us really knows how someone will govern once they attain power through elected office.  (see Hitler, Nixon, Bush, et al).  So no matter how far to the center Obama goes from here to election day, I am giving him a pass.  I’ll keep my fingers crossed that the man behind the curtain is a good, intelligent man who will do his best to change America for the better, once elected.

Sphere: Related Content

glenzilla v. olbermann


godzilla vs. kitty-zilla

We don’t have cable, so I only get to read about these things afterwards, but Olbermann has truly come to this duel with Glenn Greenwald unarmed:

…Olbermann — just as he has done on his show repeatedly ever since Obama announced his support for the [FISA] bill — also suggested that Obama is harboring a Secret Benevolent Plan that he isn’t telling anyone about whereby he is supporting the FISA bill so that he can prosecute the telecoms criminally once he’s in office:

“But anybody who got as hot about this as I did would prefer to see a President Obama prosecuting the telecoms criminally, instead of seeing a Senator Obama engender more “soft on terror” crap by casting a token vote in favor of civil litigation that isn’t going to pass since so many other Democrats caved anyway. . . . If it isn’t the Senator’s game plan, he’ll catch hell from me about it later.”

…So it’s far from certain that Obama — even if he did have a Secret Plan criminally to prosecute telecoms once in office — would even be able to do so. If Bush pardons everyone connected to his illegal spying program, as many have speculated he might, then Obama’s Secret Plan — even if it existed — would be instantaneously extinguished. That’s why these telecom lawsuits are the only real avenue left to ensure accountability and obtain a legal ruling on what was done.

But beyond all that, to give Obama a pass on his support for such a heinous bill … based on this imagined secret plan for the Good that Obama is harboring is to illustrate exactly the sort of blind faith in political leaders that is so dangerous. That’s been the Right’s mentality to excuse every last thing Bush does…

Down that mental road lies uncritical devotion to a Leader for even the most unjustifiable political acts. Depicting a bill with telecom amnesty when Bush supports it as “textbook Fascism,” only to then depict Obama’s support for such a bill as “refusing to cower to the Left,” is simply inexcusable.

I’ve had to cut out whole swaths, but the entirety is enough to make you want Glenn Greenwald as Obama’s AG.

Next time, Keith, stick to what you’re great at - calling out the liars and thugs. That’s where your needed. And you’ll make no one happier than Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity if you keep up this internecine feud.

Oh, and will someone please IM this to Obama:

What is most disturbing here is that people (including Olbermann) who for so long have vehemently criticized Democratic leaders for capitulating to Bush and trampling on the Constitution out of fear of looking “Weak” are now invoking that very excuse to justify what Obama is doing here… To excuse Obama’s conduct on that basis is to perpetuate Democratic complicity. Obama had — and will continue to have — a critical opportunity to reject and debunk that rancid framework, and it is his embrace of that framework here (”I’m going to give Bush what he wants and trample on the Constitution in order to avoid being ‘weak’”) that makes what Obama has done here so harmful and worthy of criticism.

Sphere: Related Content

the man who wasn’t there


charlie brown lucy football

It’s not even July, and already Obama’s deserting us, in mind, body and spirit.

First, on the FISA capitulation:

“The bill has changed. So I don’t think the security threats have changed, I think the security threats are similar. My view on FISA has always been that the issue of the phone companies per se is not one that overrides the security interests of the American people.”

Really? What about when you said this last week?

“[The bill] does, however, grant retroactive immunity, and I will work in the Senate to remove this provision so that we can seek full accountability for past offenses.”

Evidently the pod people have gotten to him.

Then on the death penalty:

Democrat Barack Obama said Wednesday he disagrees with the Supreme Court’s decision outlawing executions of people who rape children, a crime he said states have the right to consider for capital punishment.

“I have said repeatedly that I think that the death penalty should be applied in very narrow circumstances for the most egregious of crimes,” Obama said at a news conference. “I think that the rape of a small child, 6 or 8 years old, is a heinous crime and if a state makes a decision that under narrow, limited, well-defined circumstances the death penalty is at least potentially applicable, that that does not violate our Constitution.”

So, who gets to define those circumstances, Senator?

And now on the DC gun ban:

I have always believed that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear arms, but I also identify with the need for crime-ravaged communities to save their children from the violence that plagues our streets through common-sense, effective safety measures. The Supreme Court has now endorsed that view, and while it ruled that the D.C. gun ban went too far, Justice Scalia himself acknowledged that this right is not absolute and subject to reasonable regulations enacted by local communities to keep their streets safe. Today’s ruling, the first clear statement on this issue in 127 years, will provide much-needed guidance to local jurisdictions across the country.

…about what they can’t do to try to protect their citizens.

Maybe there really isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between he and Hillary.

Well, better the $455 went to MoveOn than to the Obama campaign, I guess.

F-U-C-K

Sphere: Related Content

the theme of the meeting is “what’s on your mind”


a pie for brian baird

Congressman Brian Baird will host a town hall meeting from 7 to 8:30 p.m. Monday in Cathlamet.

“No problem is too big and no problem is too small. Everything’s up for discussion, but to join in the conversation you have to be there,” Baird, D-Vancouver, said in a written statement.

I’d give him a piece of mine, but I’ll be on vacation (thanks to Rich and bushtool for keeping the lights on over at my place).

So, if you’re at home in Washington’s 3rd District next week, please give Brian Baird some of what’s coming to him:

Monday, June 30, 7:00-8:30 p.m.
River Street Meeting Room
68 Main Street, Cathlamet

cathlamet map

Sphere: Related Content

marmalard? dead. neidermeyer? …


betrayal

They may have passed cloture on the FISA bill (scumbags), but the bill is still out there, and I’m enough of a pollyanna to think we may still be able to do something (this is an election year, after all).

So PLEASE, call and call and call again, throughout the next week and until the Senate comes back into session after the July 4th recess.

All you Democrats who were elected in 2006 - do you really think this kind of bullshit is what we elected you for???

Oh, yeah, and Senators McCain, Clinton and Obama: WHAT THE FUCK? A vote on the sanctity of the Constitution comes second to your fucking campaigns? Your fucking debt service, Senator Clinton? You are not worthy of the Oval Office.

Now all of you preening bootlickers : get off your asses and shove this thing back down the shithole it crawled out of.

YEAs—80:
Akaka (D-HI), Alexander (R-TN), Allard (R-CO), Barrasso (R-WY), Baucus (D-MT), Bayh (D-IN), Bennett (R-UT), Bingaman (D-NM), Bond (R-MO), Brownback (R-KS), Bunning (R-KY), Burr (R-NC), Cardin (D-MD), Carper (D-DE), Casey (D-PA), Chambliss (R-GA), Coburn (R-OK), Cochran (R-MS), Coleman (R-MN), Collins (R-ME), Conrad (D-ND), Corker (R-TN), Cornyn (R-TX), Craig (R-ID), Crapo (R-ID), DeMint (R-SC). Dole (R-NC), Domenici (R-NM), Dorgan (D-ND), Ensign (R-NV), Enzi (R-WY), Feinstein (D-CA), Graham (R-SC), Grassley (R-IA), Gregg (R-NH), Hagel (R-NE), Hatch (R-UT), Hutchison (R-TX), Inhofe (R-OK), Inouye (D-HI), Isakson (R-GA), Johnson (D-SD), Klobuchar (D-MN), Kohl (D-WI), Kyl (R-AZ), Landrieu (D-LA), Levin (D-MI), Lieberman (ID-CT), Lincoln (D-AR), Lugar (R-IN), Martinez (R-FL), McCaskill (D-MO), McConnell (R-KY), Mikulski (D-MD), Murkowski (R-AK), Murray (D-WA), Nelson (D-FL), Nelson (D-NE), Pryor (D-AR), Reed (D-RI), Reid (D-NV), Roberts (R-KS), Rockefeller (D-WV), Salazar (D-CO), Sessions (R-AL), Shelby (R-AL), Smith (R-OR), Snowe (R-ME), Specter (R-PA), Stabenow (D-MI), Stevens (R-AK), Sununu (R-NH), Tester (D-MT), Thune (R-SD), Vitter (R-LA), Voinovich (R-OH), Warner (R-VA), Webb (D-VA), Whitehouse (D-RI), Wicker (R-MS).

NAYs —15:
Biden (D-DE), Boxer (D-CA), Brown (D-OH), Cantwell (D-WA), Dodd (D-CT), Durbin (D-IL), Feingold (D-WI), Harkin (D-IA), Kerry (D-MA), Lautenberg (D-NJ), Leahy (D-VT), Menendez (D-NJ), Sanders (I-VT), Schumer (D-NY), Wyden (D-OR).

Not Voting —5:
Byrd (D-WV) (excused - illness)
Clinton (D-NY)
Kennedy (D-MA) (excused - illness)
McCain (R-AZ)
Obama (D-IL)

Sphere: Related Content

more wisdom from the mustache of understanding


white man's burden

Thomas Friedman has figured it all out - again. Iraq is fucked up because the Iraqis are lazy and resentful:

One of the first things I realized when visiting Iraq after the U.S. invasion was that the very fact that Iraqis did not liberate themselves, but had to be liberated by Americans, was a source of humiliation to them. It’s one reason they never threw flowers. When someone else has to liberate you in your own home, that is humiliating — and humiliation, I believe, is the single-most underestimated force in international relations, especially in the Middle East.

That also helps explain why Iraqis initially never took ownership of their governing institutions, like the Coalition Provisional Authority, or C.P.A. They never fought for it. It was handed to them. People have to fight and win their own freedom, and that’s what gives their institutions legitimacy.

They never fought for it? What’s with all the IEDs, then?

Fucking moron.

When does the next Friedman Unit expire, by the way?

Kipling and Friedman would have made great pals:

Take up the White Man’s burden–
Send forth the best ye breed–
Go, bind your sons to exile
To serve your captives’ need;
To wait, in heavy harness,
On fluttered folk and wild–
Your new-caught sullen peoples,
Half devil and half child.

Take up the White Man’s burden–
The savage wars of peace–
Fill full the mouth of Famine,
And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest
(The end for others sought)
Watch sloth and heathen folly
Bring all your hope to nought.

I don’t know how you drill a new one in the world’s biggest asshole, but Jude and Athenae have each managed it.

Sphere: Related Content

justice in america


valdez bald eagle

If you’re fucked by Big Oil, you wait 20 years for compensation.

If you are Big Oil, you spend $800 million to save $2 billion, when over those twenty years you’ve made half a trillion dollars in profit:

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Wednesday slashed the $2.5 billion punitive damages award in the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster to $500 million.
valdez bird

Justice David Souter wrote for the court that punitive damages may not exceed what the company already paid to compensate victims for economic losses, about $500 million compensation.

A jury decided Exxon should pay $5 billion in punitive damages. A federal appeals court cut that verdict in half in 1994.

valdez otters
The Supreme Court divided on its decision, 5-3, with Justice Samuel Alito taking no part in the case because he owns Exxon stock.

valdez workerExxon has fought vigorously to reduce or erase the punitive damages verdict by a jury in Alaska four years ago for the accident that dumped 11 million gallons of oil into Prince William Sound. The environmental disaster led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of seabirds and marine animals.

In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens supported the $2.5 billion figure for punitive damages, saying Congress has chosen not to impose restrictions in such circumstances.

valdez duck
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg also dissented, saying the court was engaging in “lawmaking” by concluding that punitive damages may not exceed what the company already paid to compensate victims for economic losses.

“The new law made by the court should have been left to Congress,” wrote Ginsburg. Justice Stephen Breyer made a similar point, opposing a rigid 1 to 1 ratio of punitive damages to victim compensation.

Those $800 million legal fees have got to be the worst return on investment Exxon’s gotten in the last two decades - only 150% profit! But of course, saving money wasn’t really the point, was it?

Nope. The point was to tell any current or future plaintiff against Exxon that we will fight you until your grandchildren are dead and buried.

lee raymond

I’m too disgusted to write more, but if you want further details on this travesty, I wrote about the arguments in the case before the Supremes here.

Sphere: Related Content

put up or shut up, sen. reid


get smart shoephone

Harry Reid just emailed - on behalf of the DSCC - asking me to help fund the election of Democrats to the Senate in November.

So I emailed and called the DSCC, and told them I’d consider parting with some cash if - and only if - Dems defeat the FISA bill tomorrow.

Just one more call/email won’t kill you:

Phone (202) 224-2447
Fax (202) 969-0354
Email: info@dscc.org

Harry Reid: (202) 224-3542

After all, what price can you put on your constitutional rights.

Sphere: Related Content

Remember the Illegal War and Occupation of Iraq?


You can watch this video at the bottom of the home page of this blog but after watching it I decided it was so important that a post is necessary. The news media in this country has egregiously ignored and continues to ignore the ongoing disaster in Iraq. Iraq is MORE IMPORTANT than the housing crisis. Iraq is MORE IMPORTANT than the presidential election. Iraq is MORE IMPORTANT than the price of gasoline. Iraq is MORE IMPORTANT than the Midwest floods. Iraq is MORE IMPORTANT than…

And if you don’t think so, then you are paying too much attention to the news in this country.

Sphere: Related Content

they just keep wanking away, and hope we won’t notice


do the right thing

From Glenn Greenwald this morning:

Just as Nancy Pelosi ran to Time to justify her support for the FISA bill, Steny Hoyer yesterday spouted his justifications to The Politico and said this:

In an interview with Politico on Monday, Hoyer called the FISA legislation a “significant victory” for the Democratic Party — one that neutralized an issue Republicans might have been able to use against Democrats in November while still, in his view, protecting the civil liberties of American citizens.

In other words, Democrats achieved a “significant victory” because — by giving Republicans everything they demanded — Republicans are no longer able to criticize Democrats on this issue. What a shrewd strategy: “if we comply with all their demands, then they can’t criticize us for anything.” That’s the Democratic Party’s plan for winning, according to Hoyer.

[emphasis in bold by GG.]

If Hoyer, Pelosi et al. are making your head explode (my friend E. says aloe works well for that, by the way), try this palliative:

Senator Obama:

On Friday, June 20th, an unconstitutional FISA update bill passed the House of Representatives, which will legitimize the Bush Administration’s warrantless wiretapping program. It will give extensive powers of surveillance to the executive branch and provide an avenue for retroactive immunity for the telecoms companies that illegally spied on American citizens.

As the presumptive nominee of the Democratic party–and most likely the next President of the United States–your words and actions in the Senate carry a lot of weight. Therefore, we ask two things of you:

1) That you speak out against the bill in its entirety and encourage other Senators to vote against it when it comes up for a vote in the Senate next week.

2) That when called to vote on the FISA Bill, that you vote against it in its entirety.

Click here to sign.

It may be a placebo, but given how sick the Dems have been making me feel these days, I’ll take what I can get.

Oh, and call or email your Senators. Now. The vote is tomorrow.

Calling is better:

OREGON:
Smith (202) 224-3753
Wyden (202) 224-5244

WASHINGTON:
Cantwell (202) 224-3441
Murray (202) 224-2621

If mailbox is full for Murray, try alternate numbers:
Vancouver: (360) 696-7797
Everett: (425) 259-6515
Seattle: (206) 553-5545
Spokane: (509) 624-9515
Tacoma: (253) 572-3636
Yakima: (509) 453-7462
Bellvue: (425) 462-4460

Obama (202) 224-2854

If mailbox is full for Obama, try alternate numbers:
(312) 886-3506
(217) 492-5089
(618) 997-2402
(309) 736-1217

Sphere: Related Content


The Real News Network